Unless money is redistributed then new money will indeed have to be introduced under UBI.
If it is redistributed, then taxes seem an obvious method. And clearly the richer should be taxed more, since we're attempting redistribution.
Unfortunately we all know that trickle-down economics fail, and corporate/elite lobbyists work hard to restrain corporate/elite taxes, to keep worker wages low, and to engage in practices such as zero-hours contacts.... and so on.
So... introducing new money risks inflation. Redistributing money risks perpetuating the existing broken system.
My understanding is that most UBI proposals see the UBI as a replacement for more traditional welfare with some amount of raising taxes to keep it debt-neutral. As for the rest of what you're saying, I have no idea what you are actually trying to communicate.
If it is redistributed, then taxes seem an obvious method. And clearly the richer should be taxed more, since we're attempting redistribution.
Unfortunately we all know that trickle-down economics fail, and corporate/elite lobbyists work hard to restrain corporate/elite taxes, to keep worker wages low, and to engage in practices such as zero-hours contacts.... and so on.
So... introducing new money risks inflation. Redistributing money risks perpetuating the existing broken system.